Why 2007's 'Fantastic Four' villain Galactus didn't deserve all the hate

Galactus, the Devourer of Worlds, is one of Marvel's most memorable and feared villains since its conception. Were fans valid in their hatred towards its physical changes, or should purist fans be more open-minded?
2024 Comic-Con International: San Diego - Marvel Studios: The Ultimate Deadpool & Wolverine
2024 Comic-Con International: San Diego - Marvel Studios: The Ultimate Deadpool & Wolverine | Matt Winkelmeyer/GettyImages

Whenever a film adaptation is released, there is bound to be some level of criticism, particularly from purist fans who want to see their beloved source of entertainment adapted adequately to the screen. While some fans, reviewers, and some of the general public have had solid reasons to complain about various projects over the years, there is an adaptation that received too much-undeserved hatred at the time of its release- this being, of course, the 2007 superhero film, Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer, particularly the film's villain, Galactus.

For those who haven't read every Marvel or Fantastic Four comic out there, Galactus is known as an intergalactic entity that is frequently teamed up against the Fantastic Four team. Galactus was created by the late Stan Lee and late Jack Kirby and first appeared in the "Fantastic Four #48" comic in 1966. Also known as "The Devourer of Worlds," Galactus needs to consume planets to sustain his life force.

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS
Julia Garner as Shalla-Bal/Silver Surfer in 20th Century Studios/Marvel Studios' THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS. Photo courtesy of 20th Century Studios/Marvel Studios. © 2025 20th Century Studios / © and ™ 2025 MARVEL.

As a brief context, Galactus was once a humanoid named Galan, the sole survivor of his planet, Taa, after a plague eradicated the entire planet's population. Just before he died, Galan absorbed exorbitant amounts of energy, and once he was reborn, he became Galactus, and he now needed to feed off of other worlds to sustain himself. While he began only feeding through uninhabited planets, his hunger began growing, and he wasn't satisfied unless he consumed more. Galactus ultimately deemed himself as a superior being and began searching for more populated worlds with higher doses of power alongside his reluctant companion, the Silver Surfer.

As Galactus embodied more than a humanoid persona and believed himself to be more than his surroundings, it isn't as far-fetched as to think that Galactus could be interpreted in more ways than one. While Galactus is usually depicted in comics and other adaptations as an enormous physical being with purple armour, the film's director and production company decided to make a radical change.

20th Century Fox wanted Galactus to be discreet, and they didn't want to waste the big reveal of one of their most notorious villains in such a few frames when they were also hoping for an eventual spin-off Silver Surfer film, where Galactus would appear in his usual form. For his part, the film's director, Tim Story, corroborated this narrative as he said he had opted for this Galactus look for his more comic-accurate appearance to be seen in the spin-off.

As we all know, no third or spin-off film was ever released, and this decision has been combated by fans ever since. However, Story changed his tune in later years, as he revealed in an interview for ComicBook in 2023 his true feelings regarding Galactus' 2007 design. When asked if the cosmic storm look was the best representation of Galactus, Tim Story said, "Absolutely not. But I do not have any problem with going on record at the time."

FANTASTIC FOUR
Fantastic Four. Photo courtesy of Marvel Studios. © 2022 MARVEL.

Tim Story then added that the decision to change how Galactus was portrayed in the film was mainly made by 'those in charge,' as they weren't ready to deal with what superheroes from space would look like since Marvel hadn't taken that approach at that point either. He lastly added, "That's not the interpretation it should have been. But coming up, there will be some good stuff."

For wholly purist fans, nothing will beat the original concept, characters, and storylines—also known as the comics themselves—and that's perfectly all right. However, they should be mindful that not everyone will know the source of an adaptation as well as they do, and sometimes, creative changes must be made for these adaptations to be more palatable for casual fans and audiences.

Some adjustments or tweaks will be better or worse than others, but 2007's Galactus certainly doesn't deserve the hatred and ire it has received for decades, as there was an intended plan for Galactus to be more comic-accurate in this specific Fantastic Four universe in a future film. Also, there is still a shot of a shadow resembling Galactus' helmet in the movie for the eagle-eyed fans.

Lastly, I will leave you all with this: while Galactus' look was certainly cartoonish, no villain's look has ever been disrespected more than MODOK from Ant-Man: Quantumania. As long as that horrifying mess of CGI is in existence, no other villain deserves the same level of hatred in return.